Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text
> Jon Ivar Rykkelid wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I now tested with the adma=0 option, but if anything I got a crash 
>> quicker than before. Same error message started coming in, but this 
>> time the system hung before I was able to capture the log as well (but 
>> I saw the error, and it was the same as before, except that this time 
>> it was the ata3-channel that first started acting up..) - To remind 
>> you all what this is about, I have reattached the log that I 
>> originally captured...
> 
> Sounds like a hardware problem, since disabling ADMA is generally the 
> cure-all we use -- it appears to stress the hardware less.

If this is an MCP51 chipset, adma=0 will make no difference since that 
chipset does not support ADMA in the first place.

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/