Re: Credentials test patch

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Howells <dhowells@...>
Cc: <viro@...>, <hch@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 5:33 pm

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, David Howells wrote:

"current" has solid *historical* reasons for being that way.

Namely: it actually *was* a variable. That worked fine for UP. It got 
changed much much later.

Also, even in modern times, "current" is optimized to hell and back, and 
is often as cheap (or cheaper than) a global variable, so there is also no 
subtle performance question.

So using "current" as an excuse is not really valid. AT ALL.

		Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Credentials test patch, David Howells, (Thu Sep 13, 3:56 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, David Howells, (Tue Sep 18, 12:33 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, Trond Myklebust, (Tue Sep 18, 12:44 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, Casey Schaufler, (Tue Sep 18, 1:58 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, Trond Myklebust, (Tue Sep 18, 2:03 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, David Howells, (Tue Sep 18, 2:24 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, David Howells, (Tue Sep 18, 1:25 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, David Howells, (Mon Sep 17, 11:27 am)
Re: Credentials test patch, Ulrich Drepper, (Sat Sep 15, 11:51 am)
Re: Credentials test patch, David Howells, (Mon Sep 17, 7:02 am)
Re: Credentials test patch, Ulrich Drepper, (Mon Sep 17, 10:28 am)
Re: Credentials test patch, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 13, 4:09 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, David Howells, (Thu Sep 13, 5:19 pm)
Re: Credentials test patch, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 13, 5:33 pm)