Re: [patch] update CFI URI n mtd kconfig

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mtd@...>
Date: Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 4:31 pm

On Thu 13 Sep 2007 14:28, Josh Boyer pondered:

Even on the Intel page, it gives "Intel, AMD, Sharp, and Fujitsu" credit - why
limit Sharp, and Fujitsu to "others"? (I would just take out everyone's name).


Why not from the place that you can get the standard? http://jedec.org/

or http://www.jedec.org/download/search/jesd68-01.pdf 

There isn't any point to pick one vendor - unless you work there, own
stock, or one provides outstanding support (free hardware) for driver 
development. :)

-Robin
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] update CFI URI n mtd kconfig, Mike Frysinger, (Wed Sep 12, 11:39 pm)
Re: [patch] update CFI URI n mtd kconfig, Josh Boyer, (Thu Sep 13, 2:28 pm)
Re: [patch] update CFI URI n mtd kconfig, Robin Getz, (Thu Sep 13, 4:31 pm)
Re: [patch] update CFI URI n mtd kconfig, Josh Boyer, (Thu Sep 13, 7:09 pm)
Re: [patch] update CFI URI n mtd kconfig, Mike Frysinger, (Thu Sep 13, 5:01 pm)
Re: [patch] update CFI URI n mtd kconfig, Clemens Koller, (Fri Sep 14, 5:07 am)