Hi Sam!
On 12.09.2007 22:03, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
quoted text >> I think the Fedora approach has many benefits -- I always wondered why
>> it never went upstream like a "make install_develstuff" that install all
>> the needed bits to
>> /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/
> Last time I saw the patch is was to ugly to consider.
Do you have a pointer to that patch?
Note that in Fedora it seems all (most of) the logic is afaics in the
rpm spec file itself and thus not suitable for the kernel :-/
quoted text > Now that is maybe a year ago and I would be happy to take another look
> should someone submit it to me.
Maybe I should take a closer look at it sooner or later myself...
Cu
knurd
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)? , Thorsten Leemhuis , (Thu Sep 13, 1:09 pm)