On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Gabor Gombas wrote:Hmm. This will work as long as the peer process is running setuid to it's own unique user. Excellent idea! Since I need to make the program setuid to avoid non-priveleged ptrace attacks, this is a terrific solution. I'm actually not so concerned about the client -- that code will be trusted as well. The problem I'm trying to solve is preventing any non-priveleged code except the server and client from gaining access to their shared memory area. With the feedback I've received from this thread I think a solid design is emerging, some of which will need to be solved by system configuration by the sysadmin. Thanks, Brent -- Brent Casavant All music is folk music. I ain't bcasavan@sgi.com never heard a horse sing a song. Silicon Graphics, Inc. -- Louis Armstrong -
| Al Boldi | Re: [ck] Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu sched... |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Denys Vlasenko | [PATCH 1/2] bnx2: factor out gzip unpacker |
