On 9/12/07, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net> wrote:
quoted text
> Change the names of 'uid' and 'gid' parameters to the more appropriate
> 'dfltuid' and 'dfltgid'.
>

...

quoted text
>         strcpy(v9ses->name, V9FS_DEFUSER);
>         strcpy(v9ses->remotename, V9FS_DEFANAME);
> +       v9ses->dfltuid = V9FS_DEFUID;
> +       v9ses->dfltgid = V9FS_DEFGID;
>
...
quoted text
> +#define V9FS_DEFUID    (0)
> +#define V9FS_DEFGID    (0)

I'm not sure if there is a good solution here, but I'm uncomfortable
with using uid=0 as the default.  I'm not sure if there is a default
uid for nobody, but anything is probably better than 0.  Looks like
nfsnobody is 65534, we could use that - even if only as a marker for
the server to map it to nobody on the target system?  What do you
think?

Particularly with attach-per-user, we probably need to look at
interacting with idmapd or create our own variant real soon.

              -eric
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/