The _safe list iterators make a blanket statement about how they are safe against removal. This patch, inspired by private conversations with people who unwisely but perhaps understandably took this blanket statement at its word, adds comments stating limits to this safety. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- list.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.22/include/linux/list.h linux-2.6.22-safedoc/include/linux/list.h --- linux-2.6.22/include/linux/list.h 2007-07-08 16:32:17.000000000 -0700 +++ linux-2.6.22-safedoc/include/linux/list.h 2007-09-12 17:45:38.000000000 -0700 @@ -472,6 +472,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu( * @pos: the &struct list_head to use as a loop cursor. * @n: another &struct list_head to use as temporary storage * @head: the head for your list. + * + * Please note that this is safe only against removal by the code in + * this iterator's body (either directly or via function calls). In + * particular, it is not safe against removal by other tasks unless + * you use appropriate locking, RCU, or other synchronization + * mechanism. */ #define list_for_each_safe(pos, n, head) \ for (pos = (head)->next, n = pos->next; pos != (head); \ @@ -542,6 +548,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu( * @n: another type * to use as temporary storage * @head: the head for your list. * @member: the name of the list_struct within the struct. + * + * Please note that this is safe only against removal by the code in + * this iterator's body (either directly or via function calls). In + * particular, it is not safe against removal by other tasks unless + * you use appropriate locking, RCU, or other synchronization + * mechanism. */ #define list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, head, member) \ for (pos = list_entry((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member), \ @@ -558,6 +570,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu( * * Iterate over list of given type, continuing after current point, * safe against removal of list entry. + * + * Please note that this is safe only against removal by the code in + * this iterator's body (either directly or via function calls). In + * particular, it is not safe against removal by other tasks unless + * you use appropriate locking, RCU, or other synchronization + * mechanism. */ #define list_for_each_entry_safe_continue(pos, n, head, member) \ for (pos = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member), \ @@ -574,6 +592,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu( * * Iterate over list of given type from current point, safe against * removal of list entry. + * + * Please note that this is safe only against removal by the code in + * this iterator's body (either directly or via function calls). In + * particular, it is not safe against removal by other tasks unless + * you use appropriate locking, RCU, or other synchronization + * mechanism. */ #define list_for_each_entry_safe_from(pos, n, head, member) \ for (n = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \ @@ -589,6 +613,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu( * * Iterate backwards over list of given type, safe against removal * of list entry. + * + * Please note that this is safe only against removal by the code in + * this iterator's body (either directly or via function calls). In + * particular, it is not safe against removal by other tasks unless + * you use appropriate locking, RCU, or other synchronization + * mechanism. */ #define list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pos, n, head, member) \ for (pos = list_entry((head)->prev, typeof(*pos), member), \ @@ -623,6 +653,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu( * * Iterate over an rcu-protected list, safe against removal of list entry. * + * Please note that this is safe only against removal by the code in + * this iterator's body (either directly or via function calls). In + * particular, it is not safe against removal by other tasks unless + * you use appropriate locking, RCU, or other synchronization + * mechanism. + * * This list-traversal primitive may safely run concurrently with * the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu() * as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock(). @@ -942,6 +978,12 @@ static inline void hlist_add_after_rcu(s * @n: another &struct hlist_node to use as temporary storage * @head: the head for your list. * @member: the name of the hlist_node within the struct. + * + * Please note that this is safe only against removal by the code in + * this iterator's body (either directly or via function calls). In + * particular, it is not safe against removal by other tasks unless + * you use appropriate locking, RCU, or other synchronization + * mechanism. */ #define hlist_for_each_entry_safe(tpos, pos, n, head, member) \ for (pos = (head)->first; \ -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Andi Kleen | Re: [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Stoyan Gaydarov | From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
git: | |
| Elijah Newren | Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete bi... |
| Matthieu Moy | git push to a non-bare repository |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: Git as a filesystem |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Joachim Schipper | Re: OpenBSD/alpha Status |
| Theo de Raadt | Re: hardware needed for network stack performance work |
| Marcus Andree | Re: Cyrus IMAP performance problems [Long] |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10473] New: Infinite loop "b44: eth0: powering down PHY" |
| John Rigby | [PATCH] [Rev2] MPC5121 FEC support |
| Pekka Enberg | Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] slub: fix small HWCACHE_ALIGN alignment |
| Ilpo Järvinen | [PATCH] [TCP]: Separate lost_retrans loop into own function |
