Re: [PATCH 02/12] IB/ehca: Add 1 is not longer needed because of firmware interface change

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@...>
Cc: LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, OF-General <general@...>, Roland Dreier <rolandd@...>, OF-EWG <ewg@...>, Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...>, Christoph Raisch <raisch@...>, Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 4:21 pm

What happens if someone runs the new driver with older firmware?  Or
what if someone upgrades the firmware without updating the driver?

 - R.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 00/12] IB/ehca: New features and fixes for 2.6.24, Joachim Fenkes, (Tue Sep 11, 9:18 am)
[PATCH 10/12] IB/ehca: Path migration support, Joachim Fenkes, (Tue Sep 11, 9:34 am)
[PATCH 07/12] IB/ehca: ehca_gen_warn() should always print, Joachim Fenkes, (Tue Sep 11, 9:32 am)
[PATCH 05/12] IB/ehca: Refactor hvcall tracing, Joachim Fenkes, (Tue Sep 11, 9:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 02/12] IB/ehca: Add 1 is not longer needed becaus..., Roland Dreier, (Wed Sep 12, 4:21 pm)
[PATCH 01/12] IB/ehca: Small QP userspace support, Joachim Fenkes, (Tue Sep 11, 9:26 am)