Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » September » 12

Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets work (was: problems with lockd in 2.6.22.6)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@...>
Cc: Wolfgang Walter <wolfgang.walter@...>, <trond.myklebust@...>, <netdev@...>, <nfs@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets work (was: problems with lockd in 2.6.22.6)
Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 2:42 pm

On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Neil Brown wrote:

OK, thanks!  But, (as is alas often the case) I'm still confused:


What is it that ensures svsk->sk_inuse isn't incremented or SK_BUSY set
after that test?  Not all the code that does either of those is under
the same serv->sv_lock lock that this code is.

--b.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets wo..., Neil Brown, (Wed Sep 12, 10:14 am)
Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets wo..., J. Bruce Fields, (Wed Sep 12, 2:42 pm)
Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets wo..., Wolfgang Walter, (Wed Sep 12, 3:40 pm)
Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets wo..., J. Bruce Fields, (Wed Sep 12, 3:55 pm)
Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets wo..., Wolfgang Walter, (Fri Sep 14, 5:12 am)
Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets wo..., J. Bruce Fields, (Fri Sep 14, 10:29 am)
Re: [patch] sunrpc: make closing of old temporary sockets wo..., Wolfgang Walter, (Wed Sep 12, 6:18 pm)