Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dan Stromberg <dstromberglists@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 2:03 pm

On Sep 12 2007 10:31, Dan Stromberg wrote:

Do that for a handful of machines and it gets tiresome.


The 'proper' (though this is not an authoritative answer) way is to 
build the rpm the same way SUSE did. This ensures best compatibility and 
the fewest surprises. I am not saying it is easy, though.


Somewhat. The kernel rpm and 3rd party kernel module rpms share symbols 
so that upgrading will upgrade all the necessary things. (Instead of 
having to go through it all manually.)


It is not necessary. rpm -Uhv'ing the kernel-source rpm will repoint the 
symlink to the version you just installed.



Use http://benjiweber.co.uk:8080/webpin/ , and be happy.




	Jan
-- 
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Dan Stromberg, (Wed Sep 12, 1:31 pm)
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Bernd Petrovitsch, (Wed Sep 12, 2:03 pm)
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Thorsten Leemhuis, (Wed Sep 12, 3:46 pm)
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Sam Ravnborg, (Wed Sep 12, 4:03 pm)
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Thorsten Leemhuis, (Thu Sep 13, 1:09 pm)
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Sep 13, 1:22 pm)
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Thorsten Leemhuis, (Thu Sep 13, 1:26 pm)
Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?, Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Sep 12, 2:03 pm)