login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
12
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 8:45 am
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:27:16AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:34:13PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > As an example, visws.c is as much non-64bit as it is pre-i686. > > Bullshit. visws were shipped with P3s.
Certainly true, but still not 64bit and never will be. -- Len Sorensen -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
x86 merge - a little feedback
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Tue Sep 11, 4:12 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:21 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Wed Sep 12, 3:09 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Sep 11, 4:38 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Adrian Bunk
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:14 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 5:32 am)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Andi Kleen
, (Sat Sep 15, 2:36 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Andrew Morton
, (Sun Sep 16, 1:08 am)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:34 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Paul Mundt
, (Tue Sep 11, 8:29 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 6:55 am)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:51 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Jan Engelhardt
, (Wed Sep 12, 2:14 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Adrian Bunk
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:51 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Adrian Bunk
, (Tue Sep 11, 4:34 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Wed Sep 12, 5:27 am)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Lennart Sorensen
, (Wed Sep 12, 8:45 am)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:05 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Adrian Bunk
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:09 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Tue Sep 11, 4:25 pm)
Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
, Linus Torvalds
, (Tue Sep 11, 5:24 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
david
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Parag Warudkar
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Heiko Carstens
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
David Miller
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
7 users
and
1032 guests
online.
Online users
backtolife88
sreejithc
growstra09
pivotpointsc
formacioncont
bridgewayestate
babyboy12
Syndicate