login
Header Space

 
 

Re: time_after - what on earth???

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian McMenamin <lkmladrian@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linuxsh-dev@...>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 6:19 pm

On 09/12/2007 12:15 AM, Adrian McMenamin wrote:


If it had been a signed type, it could've wrapped to something you didn't 
expect, explaining the difference at least...

With an unsigned long, the only diference should be that time_after() deals 
with jiffie wrapping which I assume is not an actual problem here. I'll 
retreat into the shades again... ;-(

Rene.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
time_after - what on earth???, Adrian McMenamin, (Tue Sep 11, 6:05 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, Rene Herman, (Tue Sep 11, 6:11 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, Adrian McMenamin, (Tue Sep 11, 6:15 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, Rene Herman, (Tue Sep 11, 6:19 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, , (Tue Sep 11, 7:09 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, Rene Herman, (Tue Sep 11, 7:16 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, Adrian McMenamin, (Tue Sep 11, 7:10 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, , (Tue Sep 11, 7:50 pm)
Re: time_after - what on earth???, Adrian McMenamin, (Tue Sep 11, 8:03 pm)
speck-geostationary