On Wednesday 12 September 2007 07:48, Christoph Lameter wrote:Yes. I think we differ on our interpretations of "okay". In my interpretation, it is not OK to use this patch as a way to solve VM or FS or IO scalability issues, especially not while the alternative approaches that do _not_ have these problems have not been adequately compared or argued against. So even after all this time you do not understand what the fundamental problem is with anti-frag and yet you are happy to waste both our time in endless flamewars telling me how wrong I am about it. Forgive me if I'm starting to be rude, Christoph. This is really irritating. -
| Satyam Sharma | Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Robin Lee Powell | NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested. |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Michal Piotrowski | Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 |
git: | |
| Shawn Pearce | Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Pierre Habouzit | [PATCH] git-revert is one of the most misunderstood command in git, help users out. |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Douglas A. Tutty | OBSD's perspective on SELinux |
| askthelist | Packets Per Second Limit? |
| Christophe Rioux | OpenBSD as host for VMWare Server |
| Daniel J Blueman | [sky2, solved] transmit timeouts and firmware update... |
| Octavian Purdila | [RFC] support for IEEE 1588 |
| Johann Baudy | Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | [resend take 2 0/4] Distributed storage. |
