> On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > It evidently assumes cpuidle to be present, which is not in the mainline.
> >
> > Bear in mind that the cpuidle patch fixes resume-from-ram when cpuidle is
> > disabled in config.
> >
> > > It seems to me that the total effect of this one and the hackpatch is that
> > > the C states are not handled any more.
> >
> > hm.
> >
> > dmesg without the cpuidle patch:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-bad.txt
> > dmesg with the cpuidle patch:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-good.txt
> > difference:
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-diff.txt
> >
> > there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in the time handling, except
> > there are large changes in when things happen in the bootup sequence.
>
> The question is whether the system goes into C2 with the patch applied.
>
> Can you please provide the output of /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power for
> both the bad and the good one ?
>