Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <kexec@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-arch@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 1:21 pm

* Lombard, David N <dnlombar@ichips.intel.com> [2007-09-11 17:32]:

Given that lilo appends the user-specified command line, I think it's
the best to honor the last value. It has also been the previous
behaviour (execpt IA64).

Having a different behaviour if the last or the first value is honored
on different architectures is not what we want, IMO.


Thanks,
   Bernhard
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Bernhard Walle, (Sun Sep 9, 4:39 am)
Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Olaf Dabrunz, (Tue Sep 11, 9:14 am)
Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Lombard, David N, (Tue Sep 11, 11:32 am)
Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Bernhard Walle, (Tue Sep 11, 1:21 pm)
Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Vivek Goyal, (Tue Sep 11, 2:15 am)
Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Bernhard Walle, (Tue Sep 11, 6:01 am)
Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Vivek Goyal, (Wed Sep 12, 7:23 am)
Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line, Bernhard Walle, (Wed Sep 12, 7:35 am)