Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <mgross@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 - 11:51 am

Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com> writes:

Because NTP is a completely different beast.  NTP is used to keep a
software clock synchronized with a remote source.  This software clock
is usually implemented as a software PLL on top of a high-resolution
hardware clock, with the remote clock serving as frequency reference.

What I need to do, however, is calibrate a low-resolution hardware
clock using a trusted reference (which could very well be a software
clock maintained by NTP).

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Sm
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, , (Tue Sep 11, 9:48 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, Arne Georg Gleditsch, (Wed Sep 12, 6:49 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, , (Wed Sep 12, 6:59 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, Mark Gross, (Tue Sep 11, 11:23 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, , (Tue Sep 11, 12:28 pm)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, , (Tue Sep 11, 11:51 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, Clemens Koller, (Tue Sep 11, 10:33 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, , (Tue Sep 11, 11:02 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, Clemens Koller, (Tue Sep 11, 11:36 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, , (Tue Sep 11, 12:04 pm)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, Pavel Machek, (Wed Oct 31, 7:03 am)
Re: [RFC+PATCH] RTC calibration, Clemens Koller, (Tue Sep 11, 3:02 pm)