On Tue, 11 September 2007 04:52:19 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:While I agree with your concern, those numbers are quite silly. The chances of 99.8% of pages being free and the remaining 0.2% being perfectly spread across all 2MB large_pages are lower than those of SHA1 creating a collision. I don't see anyone abandoning git or rsync, so your extreme example clearly is the wrong one. Again, I agree with your concern, even though your example makes it look silly. Jörn -- You can't tell where a program is going to spend its time. Bottlenecks occur in surprising places, so don't try to second guess and put in a speed hack until you've proven that's where the bottleneck is. -- Rob Pike -
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel, use it in more dr... |
| Philipp Marek | Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
git: | |
| Krishna Kumar | [PATCH 9/10 REV5] [IPoIB] Implement batching |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
