On 11/09/2007, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
I guess, 'rq->curr == tsk' implies a task was on the 'rq' (before
dequeueing) in this particular case. What's about a minor optimization
like below (plus, let's make use of task_running()):
[ btw., real-time task can be also added to a container, right? I
guess, it can be used at least for group-aware load-balancing of
rt_tasks... otherwise, I guess, cpu-resource controlling is not that
applicable to, say, SCHED_FIFO :-)
Anyway, to this goal rt_task should become aware of group-related bits
of the 'struct sched_entity'... and at the moment, the code below is
effectively just a 'nop' for them.. right? ]
/* change task's runqueue when it moves between groups */
static void sched_move_task(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont,
struct container *old_cont, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
int on_rq, running;
unsigned long flags;
struct rq *rq;
rq = task_rq_lock(tsk, &flags);
update_rq_clock(rq);
running = task_running(rq, tsk);
on_rq = tsk->se.on_rq;
if (on_rq) {
dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
if (unlikely(running) && tsk->sched_class == &fair_sched_class)
tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
}
set_task_cfs_rq(tsk);
if (on_rq) {
enqueue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
if (unlikely(running) && tsk->sched_class == &fair_sched_class)
tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
}
task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
}
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
-
