On Wednesday 12 September 2007 04:25, Maxim Levitsky wrote:I'm not sure that it is too hard. OK it is far from trivial... This is not a new idea though, it has been floated around for a long time (since before Linux I'm sure, although have no references). There are lots of reasons why such an approach has fundamental performance problems too, however. Your kernel can't use huge tlbs for a lot of memory, you can't find the physical address of a page without walking page tables, defragmenting still has a significant cost in terms of moving pages and flushing TLBs etc. So the train of thought up to now has been that a virtually mapped kernel would be "the problem with the VM itself" ;) We're actually at a point now where higher order allocations are pretty rare and not a big problem (except with very special cases like hugepages and memory hotplug which can mostly get away with compromises, so we don't want to turn over the kernel just for these). So in my opinion, any increase of the dependence on higher order allocations is simply a bad move until a killer use-case can be found. They move us further away from good behaviour on our assumed ideal of an identity mapped kernel. (I don't actually dislike the idea of virtually mapped kernel. Maybe hardware trends will favour that model and there are some potential simple instructions a CPU can implement to help with some of the performance hits. I'm sure it will be looked at again for Linux one day) -
| Lennart Sorensen | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Dmitry Torokhov | Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm3 |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
