* Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:39:34 +0100 * Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903This is very brutal way of doing things, that somebody forced to do against unwilling e-mails. I have it enabled in exim also as an experiment (thus, see reply-to/mail-follow-up). It doesn't stop, but reduces spam. Especially this is wrong WRT mailing list. That's why i've proposed * trivial checking for `in-reply-to/references' (SHOULD in rfc2822) (see, wizard -- no hands!) * starting new threads will require valid ticket-requesting message first (as part of patch bomb of something like that, for instance). My experiments show, that spam doesn't have any hint of mail header magic, only stupid ms outlook stuff. Thus i don't think that idea is very insecure and all that kind of things. Conversely developers like Alan will not spend time and energy arguing about `modern ways of dealing with reality' :) -- -o--=O`C #oo'L O <___=E M -
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Eric W. Biederman | [PATCH] macvlan: Support creating macvlans from macvlans |
