On 09/11/2007 12:41 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:I agree that doing things only half is semi-regularly worse than doing them not at all, and this specific case might be the worst example of all, as I read that using sys_open/read is actively harmful, so, well... I read the thread since I tend to keep lots of external crap around. Not in any way that would mean I'd have any grounds for complaining about anything; mostly just driver stuff in various states of completeness that I never seem to get around to cleaning up enough to submit to anyone. But as such, I can comment on the fact that I'm much more likely to notice the warning than I am to notice a thread on LKML, say. How much more likely I'd be to then also actually do anything about it before it just breaks anyway is another matter, but again, well... In this case I believe it makes sense to just rip it out, but generally it doesn't need to be such a fully robotic yes/no decision, I'd say. Rene. -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Ingo Molnar | iwlwifi: fix build bug in "iwlwifi: fix LED stall" |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Avi Kivity | Re: [RFC PATCH 14/17] kvm: add a reset capability |
git: | |
