login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
September
»
10
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>
To: Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Date: Monday, September 10, 2007 - 3:12 pm
On 09/08/2007 01:17 AM, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
quoted text
> On the day of Friday 07 September 2007 Chuck Ebbert hast written: >> On 09/06/2007 07:31 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >>> Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> writes: >>>> Some systems lock up without the noapic option. >>> Please find patterns: cpu type, chipsets, mainboard vendors etc. >> This is the first one I've actually had in front of me: >> >> HP TX1000 notebook >> Nvidia C51/MCP51 mobile chipset > > Do you have a hpet? If not, have you tried using acpi_use_timer_override with > apic?
Yes, it has an hpet. And I tried every combination of options I could think of. But, even stranger, x86_64 works (only i386 fails.) -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Wed Sep 5, 7:30 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andi Kleen
, (Thu Sep 6, 7:31 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 3:39 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Sat Sep 15, 2:42 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Ingo Oeser
, (Sat Sep 15, 6:58 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andrew Morton
, (Sat Sep 15, 7:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Matthew Garrett
, (Sat Sep 15, 8:08 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Dave Jones
, (Mon Sep 24, 5:32 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Phillip Susi
, (Thu Sep 27, 6:03 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Fri Sep 7, 3:34 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Prakash Punnoor
, (Sat Sep 8, 1:17 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Mon Sep 10, 3:12 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Andi Kleen
, (Mon Sep 10, 3:44 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Thu Sep 13, 12:38 pm)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Thomas Gleixner
, (Tue Sep 25, 5:06 am)
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
, Chuck Ebbert
, (Mon Sep 10, 7:33 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers
Andy Whitcroft
Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 -- x86_64 blade hard hangs
Rafael J. Wysocki
2.6.26-rc1-git9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Andy Grover
[PATCH 01/21] RDS: Socket interface
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
5 users
and
1232 guests
online.
Online users
izzikkann
twitfollow1000
kathrichardson
Nelson
armyguy1954
Syndicate