> I would like to see "everyone" explain what we lose by giving developers aWe lose the ability to get anything done on a timescale that makes it happen. Instead we have this continual cycle of remove, akpm says no, submitter forgets, 3 month pause, remove, akpm says no, ... Adrian does now and then try and remove stuff its stupid to remove. People NAK those quite promptly. We've been trying to deprecate sys_open and the other related exports since 1.3.x or thereabouts. There is almost no correct sane way to use these exports either, because your fs struct may be shared so horrible things happen. I'm (minus the language selection) with Christoph "Effing" Hellwig on this one - for these symbols at least. When we break stuff people moan and we can put them back, providing they go into the Linus tree fairly early in the -rc sequence. In the cases we've inadvertently broken stuff before people have moaned fairly quickly too - eg when the tty layer took some inlines into _GPL exports by accident. Alan -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Willy Tarreau | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
| Jan Kundrát | kswapd high CPU usage with no swap |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once |
