Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <clameter@...>
Cc: <torvalds@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...>
Date: Saturday, September 1, 2007 - 3:17 pm

On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 12:05 -0700, clameter@sgi.com wrote:


 - reclaim

by mixing large order pages into the regular lru, page aging gets rather
unfair.

One possible solution to this is address_space based reclaim, something
which might also be beneficial for containers.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6, , (Tue Aug 28, 3:05 pm)
Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6, Peter Zijlstra, (Sat Sep 1, 3:17 pm)
Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6, Christoph Lameter, (Sun Sep 2, 7:44 am)
Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Aug 28, 3:20 pm)
Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Aug 28, 3:55 pm)
Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 31, 9:11 pm)