On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote:

quoted text
> On Monday 06 August 2007 11:42, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > Currently your system likely would have died here, so ending up
> > > with a reserve page temporarily on the wrong node is already an
> > > improvement.
> >
> > The system would have died? Why?
> 
> Because a block device may have deadlocked here, leaving the system 
> unable to clean dirty memory, or unable to load executables over the 
> network for example.

So this is a locking problem that has not been taken care of?

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/