On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd prefer having two new per-ARCH config symbols though: config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend. johannes
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerhard Pircher | 3c59x: shared interrupt problem |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
