Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, pm list <linux-pm@...>, Russell King <rmk@...>
Date: Monday, August 6, 2007 - 7:15 am

On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:


This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd prefer
having two new per-ARCH config symbols though:
config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
	depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE

and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.

johannes
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-pm] Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of C..., Johannes Berg, (Mon Aug 6, 7:15 am)