Re: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Monday, August 6, 2007 - 12:13 am

* Beauchemin, Mark <Mark.Beauchemin@sycamorenet.com> wrote:



could you please change this to use 'current' (instead of the CPU 
number) as the xmit_lock_owner unconditionally? That results in much 
fewer #ifdefs and far cleaner code.

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Thu Jun 21, 12:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Jun 22, 1:03 am)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Sat Jun 23, 7:08 am)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Jun 23, 7:26 am)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Tue Jul 24, 8:48 am)
Re: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jul 24, 12:15 pm)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Tue Jul 24, 12:36 pm)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Wed Aug 1, 7:15 am)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Wed Aug 1, 7:22 am)
Re: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Aug 6, 12:13 am)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Tue Aug 7, 12:41 pm)
RE: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Beauchemin, Mark, (Mon Sep 17, 6:03 am)
Re: [PATCH -rt] Preemption problem in kernel RT Patch, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Sep 17, 6:59 am)