login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
August
»
31
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Ian Kent <raven@...>
To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@...>
Cc: John Stoffel <john@...>, Peter Staubach <staubach@...>, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
Date: Friday, August 31, 2007 - 11:30 am
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:10 -0400,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:06:36 +0800, Ian Kent said: > > So, there's a power outage and the UPS had a glitch. > > Murphy can get a *lot* more creative than that. > > So we'd outgrown the capacity on our UPS and diesel generator, and decided > to replace them. So we schedule downtime for a Saturday. Rather scary, we > had a Sun E10K that had been powered-up for several years, and just as expected, > a good fraction of the 400+ drives it had failed to re-spinup. While recovering > from that, we discovered that although the vast majority of the 400 drives were > either mirrors or raidsets, due to a config error, the boot volume wasn't > mirrored (fortunately, it spun up OK so we dodged the bullet), so we fixed that. > > Literally the next Friday, not even a week later, a contractor relocating a > door into our machine room shorted out a sensor circuit in our fire suppression > system, triggering a Halon dump. Of course, no amount of UPS and diesel was > going to save us now, because there was a safety interlock that killed the > power feeds if the Halon dumped. This time, since they'd all been stressed > just a week before, only 2 of the 400+ disks on the E10K failed to spin up. > > Guess which two. ;)
Eeeeeekkkk!! The mirrors, of course. Ian -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Robin Lee Powell
, (Mon Aug 20, 6:54 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, John Stoffel
, (Tue Aug 21, 12:43 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Peter Staubach
, (Tue Aug 21, 1:01 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, John Stoffel
, (Tue Aug 21, 2:50 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Ian Kent
, (Fri Aug 31, 4:06 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
,
, (Fri Aug 31, 11:10 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Ian Kent
, (Fri Aug 31, 11:30 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
,
, (Tue Aug 21, 7:04 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, John Stoffel
, (Wed Aug 22, 11:26 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Theodore Tso
, (Wed Aug 22, 6:03 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, J. Bruce Fields
, (Tue Aug 21, 3:25 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Ric Wheeler
, (Fri Aug 24, 11:09 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, J. Bruce Fields
, (Fri Aug 24, 11:53 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Peter Staubach
, (Fri Aug 24, 11:37 am)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Peter Staubach
, (Tue Aug 21, 3:04 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Robin Lee Powell
, (Tue Aug 21, 1:14 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Peter Staubach
, (Tue Aug 21, 1:18 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, Chakri n
, (Tue Aug 21, 1:14 pm)
Re: NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
, J. Bruce Fields
, (Tue Aug 21, 12:55 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
jjohansen
[AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Heiko Carstens
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
Andrew Morton
2.6.23-rc6-mm1
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Evgeniy Polyakov
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
594 guests
online.
Syndicate