Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...>

To: <eranian@...>

Cc: <B.Steinbrink@...>, <ak@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>

Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21

Date: Friday, August 31, 2007 - 10:43 am

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:05 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
quoted text> Daniel,

quoted text> Yes, I realized I missed a small detail in the switch statement.
> Could you try the new version?

This patch still has the stuck NMI .. Essentially the same thing that
happened without the patch..

Feel free to keep sending patches, I'll test them all ..

Daniel

-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 7, 8:06 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Wed Aug 8, 10:20 am)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 1:54 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 1:55 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 6:55 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 7:07 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 5:12 am)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 10:34 am)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 1:05 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 2:30 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 4:21 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 3:46 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 4:26 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 4:13 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Wed Aug 29, 5:24 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 29, 9:21 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Thu Aug 30, 5:05 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 10:43 am)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Fri Aug 31, 12:21 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 12:35 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 2:06 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 8:24 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 5:12 am)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 9:00 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 9:36 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 6:19 am)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Sat Sep 1, 3:51 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 4:32 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 1, 4:46 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 20, 12:44 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Michal Piotrowski, (Thu Aug 23, 4:08 pm)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Thu Aug 23, 5:22 pm)

Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Aug 26, 8:45 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., David Rees, (Mon Aug 27, 4:11 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:42 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Andrew Morton, (Mon Aug 27, 3:51 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 12:26 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Andrew Morton, (Mon Aug 27, 12:44 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 1:08 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Andrew Morton, (Mon Aug 27, 2:26 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Adrian Bunk, (Mon Aug 27, 12:52 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:38 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Aug 27, 8:35 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:02 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 11:13 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:26 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 11:39 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., David Rees, (Mon Aug 27, 3:12 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 3:42 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Adrian Bunk, (Wed Aug 29, 6:23 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Bill Davidsen, (Thu Aug 30, 11:54 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Adrian Bunk, (Mon Sep 3, 8:43 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 7:59 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Thu Aug 30, 11:24 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Adrian Bunk, (Mon Sep 3, 8:29 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Mon Sep 3, 9:20 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Adrian Bunk, (Thu Aug 30, 4:51 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 1:02 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 1:17 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Jeff Garzik, (Mon Aug 27, 5:41 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:35 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Adrian Bunk, (Mon Aug 27, 12:09 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 12:05 pm)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 10:39 am)

Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:11 am)

Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 8, 11:20 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Vladislav Bolkhovitin	Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Andrew Morton	-mm merge plans for 2.6.23
Can E. Acar	Re: Wasting our Freedom
git:

linux-netdev:
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
PJ Waskiewicz	[ANNOUNCE] ixgbe: Data Center Bridging (DCB) support for ixgbe
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Online users

Syndicate