Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Denys Vlasenko
Date: Friday, August 31, 2007 - 4:11 am

On Wednesday 29 August 2007 23:34, Eric Sandeen wrote:
...

KSYM_NAME_LEN = 128 sounds stupid. The name which is wider than 80 chars??
Kernel shouldn't have names that long.
Say, 50 chars ought to be enough.
--
vda
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Eric Sandeen, (Wed Aug 29, 3:34 pm)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Jesper Juhl, (Wed Aug 29, 3:53 pm)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Eric Sandeen, (Wed Aug 29, 4:01 pm)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Kyle Moffett, (Wed Aug 29, 4:55 pm)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Denys Vlasenko, (Fri Aug 31, 4:11 am)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Jörn, (Fri Aug 31, 7:35 am)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Denys Vlasenko, (Fri Aug 31, 10:16 am)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Mike Snitzer, (Wed May 28, 7:36 am)
Re: 4KSTACKS + DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW harmful, Eric Sandeen, (Wed May 28, 8:13 am)