Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <kbuild-devel@...>
Date: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 5:06 pm

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

In fact no: although CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION were certainly
involved in the logic which arrived at missetting CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU,
they were correctly prompted for themselves.

Hugh
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Mon Aug 27, 10:54 am)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Aug 27, 1:26 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Mon Aug 27, 4:49 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Sam Ravnborg, (Wed Aug 29, 2:01 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Roman Zippel, (Wed Aug 29, 11:06 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Thu Aug 30, 8:40 am)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Aug 30, 2:48 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Thu Aug 30, 5:06 pm)