Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <kbuild-devel@...>
Date: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 2:48 pm

On Thursday, 30 August 2007 14:40, Hugh Dickins wrote:

Probably CONFIG_SUSPEND, which was a new option, defaulted to 'y' and selected
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU indirectly, because CONFIG_SMP was set.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Mon Aug 27, 10:54 am)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Aug 27, 1:26 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Mon Aug 27, 4:49 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Sam Ravnborg, (Wed Aug 29, 2:01 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Roman Zippel, (Wed Aug 29, 11:06 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Thu Aug 30, 8:40 am)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Aug 30, 2:48 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU: kconfig bug?, Hugh Dickins, (Thu Aug 30, 5:06 pm)