Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...>, <linville@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-wireless@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 - 3:37 pm

On Wednesday 29 August 2007 21:33:43 Jon Smirl wrote:

I think it's a valid assumption, if we say that the author
of the patch read the license header of a file and agreed with it.
So the patch is licensed to whatever the fileheader says. And if
there's none, it's licensed with the COPYING terms.
If a patch author likes some other license conditions, he must
explicitely add them with the patch to the file, saying that this
and that part have these and those conditions. Of course they must
be compatible with the original license.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jiri Slaby, (Tue Aug 28, 12:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Johannes Berg, (Wed Aug 29, 5:59 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Aug 29, 6:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Xavier Bestel, (Wed Aug 29, 9:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Johannes Berg, (Thu Aug 30, 7:59 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Aug 28, 1:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jon Smirl, (Wed Aug 29, 2:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Alan Cox, (Wed Aug 29, 2:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jon Smirl, (Wed Aug 29, 3:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, David Newall, (Thu Aug 30, 9:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Alan Cox, (Wed Aug 29, 3:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jarek Poplawski, (Thu Aug 30, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Michael Buesch, (Wed Aug 29, 3:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jarek Poplawski, (Thu Aug 30, 4:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jarek Poplawski, (Thu Aug 30, 4:32 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Luis R. Rodriguez, (Tue Aug 28, 4:11 pm)