On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:29:32 -0400 Daniel Drake <ddrake@brontes3d.com> wrote: Hi,sounds like about disk speed (at random-seek IO pattern) before you go there... is this a "real life" problem? Or just a mostly-artificial corner case? (the answer to that obviously is relevant for the 'should we really care' question) Another question, if this is during system shutdown, maybe that's a valid case for flushing most of the pagecache first (from userspace) since most of what's there won't be used again anyway. If that's enough to make this go faster... A third question, have you investigated what happens if a process gets killed that has pages in swap; as long as we don't page those in but just forget about them, that would solve the shutdown problem nicely (since we kill stuff first anyway there) -
| Mike Galbraith | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [3/22] x86_64: Kill temp boot pmds |
| Alan Cox | Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...? |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Brandeburg, Jesse | RE: [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
