On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:A regression since when, I wonder? Please do NOT waste any time bisecting, but I'd be interested to know which release or -rc you previously found it worked on. When I gave the code a quick look, it appeared to be something which has long been wrong; but I didn't investigate whether per-cpu allocation has changed recently. My _suspicion_, no more than that, is that it might be a regression to you because you're now forced to have CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y where you didn't need it before. Anyway, it doesn't matter too much what it's a regression since: it's a bug that needs fixing whatever, and should be simple. My x86_64 was running other tests yesterday which I didn't want to interrupt, but I'll take a look later on today. Hugh -
| Linus Torvalds | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 03/13] syslets: generic kernel bits |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gregory Haskins | [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
