Daniel Phillips wrote:Given that there is already some charter that says KS attendees vote... isn't it best to retain that? Directives from above aside, you need specifications on how to change voting procedure before changing it, no? If those don't exist, then something vaguely similar in my country would require a referendum I think. Hasn't the KS committee / TAB board vote rigging conspiracy theory been raised yet? Given they're not running a country, it would be great fun to see the board getting corrupted and go off the rails ;) I'd vote for them because if Ted has anything to do with it, I *know* we'll be having KS in Hawaii ;) -- -
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Nick Piggin | [patch 3/6] mm: fix fault vs invalidate race for linear mappings |
| Stefan Richter | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
| Ingo Molnar | [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
git: | |
| Peter Zijlstra | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Robert Blum | And another version of the INFO sheet |
| Marc CORSINI | find-1.2 (binaries only) |
| Yanek Martinson | Re: Porting g++ 1.40.3 |
