Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...>
Cc: <linville@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-wireless@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 1:11 pm

On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:00:50PM -0400, Jiri Slaby wrote:

Is this really a good idea?  Most of the reverse-engineering was
done by the OpenBSD folks, and it would certainly be helpful to
work together with them on new hardware revisions, etc..
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jiri Slaby, (Tue Aug 28, 12:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Johannes Berg, (Wed Aug 29, 5:59 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Aug 29, 6:35 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Xavier Bestel, (Wed Aug 29, 9:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Johannes Berg, (Thu Aug 30, 7:59 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Aug 28, 1:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jon Smirl, (Wed Aug 29, 2:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Alan Cox, (Wed Aug 29, 2:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jon Smirl, (Wed Aug 29, 3:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, David Newall, (Thu Aug 30, 9:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Alan Cox, (Wed Aug 29, 3:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jarek Poplawski, (Thu Aug 30, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Michael Buesch, (Wed Aug 29, 3:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jarek Poplawski, (Thu Aug 30, 4:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Jarek Poplawski, (Thu Aug 30, 4:32 am)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Net: ath5k, license is GPLv2, Luis R. Rodriguez, (Tue Aug 28, 4:11 pm)