> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > * Christoph Lameter (
clameter@sgi.com) wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, if the fast path can be done with a preempt off, it might be doable
> > > > to suffer the slow path with a per cpu lock like that.
> > >
> > > Sadly the cmpxchg_local requires local per cpu data access. Isnt there
> > > some way to make this less expensive on RT? Acessing cpu local memory is
> > > really good for performance on NUMA since the data is optimally placed and
> > > one can avoid/reduce locking if the process stays tied to the processor.
> > >
> >
> > On the slow path, in slab_new, we already have to reenable interrupts
> > because we can sleep. If we make sure that whenever we return to an irq
> > disable code path we take the current per-cpu data structure again, can
> > we make the preempt-disable/irq-disabled code paths O(1) ?
>
> Not sure exactly what you are getting at?
> This would mean running __alloc_pages tied to one processor even though
> waiting is possible?
>