Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <eranian@...>
Cc: Björn <B.Steinbrink@...>, <ak@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>
Date: Monday, August 27, 2007 - 1:55 pm

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 10:54 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:

Here is the cpuinfo for processor 0 .. It's got four cores so this isn't
the full /proc/cpuinfo output ..

processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel 
cpu family      : 6
model           : 14
model name      : Intel(R) Dual Pentium(R) M CPU        @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 8
cpu MHz         : 1992.000
cache size      : 2048 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 2
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htr
bogomips        : 4002.48
clflush size    : 64



-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 7, 8:06 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Wed Aug 8, 10:20 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 1:54 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 1:55 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Mon Aug 27, 6:55 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 27, 7:07 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 5:12 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 10:34 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 1:05 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 2:30 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 4:21 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Tue Aug 28, 3:46 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 4:26 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Tue Aug 28, 4:13 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Wed Aug 29, 5:24 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 29, 9:21 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Thu Aug 30, 5:05 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 10:43 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Fri Aug 31, 12:21 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 12:35 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 2:06 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 8:24 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 5:12 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Björn, (Fri Aug 31, 9:00 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Fri Aug 31, 9:36 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 6:19 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Stephane Eranian, (Sat Sep 1, 3:51 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Andi Kleen, (Sat Sep 1, 4:32 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 1, 4:46 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Mon Aug 20, 12:44 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Michal Piotrowski, (Thu Aug 23, 4:08 pm)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Thu Aug 23, 5:22 pm)
Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Sun Aug 26, 8:45 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:42 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:38 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Aug 27, 8:35 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:02 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:26 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 3:42 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Natalie Protasevich, (Wed Aug 29, 7:59 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Thu Aug 30, 11:24 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases?, Stefan Richter, (Mon Sep 3, 9:20 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 1:02 pm)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 7:35 am)
Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was ..., Michal Piotrowski, (Mon Aug 27, 11:11 am)
Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21, Daniel Walker, (Wed Aug 8, 11:20 am)