Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC][PATCH] clustered writeback

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, David Chinner <dgc@...>, Michael Rubin <mrubin@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, August 27, 2007 - 8:03 am

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:21:52 +0800

25 seconds is quite not good already though.... it takes a disk a
second or two of no activity to go into low power mode, every 25
seconds means you now have at least a 10% constant power cost....

I don't know the right answer (well other than "make sure inodes aren't
dirty", which involves fixing apps to not do as much file operations,
as well as relatime) but just "every 25s is no big deal" isn't really
the case ;-(
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/3] [RFC][PATCH] clustered writeback, Fengguang Wu, (Mon Aug 27, 7:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC][PATCH] clustered writeback, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Aug 27, 8:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC][PATCH] clustered writeback, Chris Mason, (Mon Aug 27, 8:43 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] [RFC][PATCH] clustered writeback, Fengguang Wu, (Mon Aug 27, 8:27 am)