login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
August
»
26
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>
To: Paul Rolland <rol@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...>
Subject:
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata
Date: Sunday, August 26, 2007 - 7:37 pm
Hi, [Adding linux-ide to CC] On 26/08/07, Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net> wrote:
quoted text
> Hello, > > My machine (an ASUS P5W-DH-Deluxe, Core2, 4Go RAM, 3 SATA and 2IDE) is > reporting a : > irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > together with a Call Trace, but : > - irqpoll is present on the command line, > - the irq is reported to be used by libata, > - the irqpoll option is mandatory if I want _some_ of my SATA disks to be > accessible. > > I've attached a file with : > - dmesg, > - cat /proc/interrupts > - lspci > - lspci -vvv > - my .config > > I've tried mounting and accessing all the disks, and it works. > The last weird thing : though reported as used by libata, the irq 23 counter > seems to be fixed at 200001, though I've mounted and accessed all the > disks ! > > Paul >
Regards, Michal -- LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sun Aug 26, 2:35 pm)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Tejun Heo
, (Sat Sep 8, 3:23 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sun Sep 9, 2:59 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sat Sep 15, 9:38 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Michal Piotrowski
, (Sun Aug 26, 7:37 pm)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Tejun Heo
, (Thu Oct 18, 11:23 pm)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Sun Oct 21, 5:11 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Paul Rolland
, (Fri Oct 19, 8:14 am)
Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully use...
, Bjoern Olausson
, (Fri Oct 19, 9:52 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ingo Molnar
[patch 12/13] syslets: x86: optimized copy_uatom()
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 017/196] aoechr: Convert from class_device to device
Yinghai Lu
Re: 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6
Jan Engelhardt
intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
2 users
and
688 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
f0restridge
Syndicate