On 8/26/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote:(Sorry if this goes to the list twice... Mailer problems.) Ok, I did this on a non-production machine that has only been up for a few hours, and here's what happened: ======== Before ========= $ free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 878 824 54 0 111 422 -/+ buffers/cache: 290 587 Swap: 63 0 63 ======== After ======== root@b0$ free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 878 47 830 0 6 4 -/+ buffers/cache: 36 841 Swap: 63 0 63 ====================== So, I guess it worked? (I don't know what was supposed to happen, but memory usage dropped significantly when I did this.) However, I'm not sure this staging machine has been up long enough or doing enough to exhibit the problem. I can try this on my production servers (the ones I provided graphs for) late tonight, but how safe is running this command? Does it permanently disable file caching? Do I need to reset it afterwards? If I stop all services (databases, logging, etc) first, am I protected against data loss? -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Borislav Petkov | 2.6.23-rc1: no setup signature found... |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
