Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, August 26, 2007 - 12:16 pm

On 8/26/07, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote:

(Sorry if this goes to the list twice... Mailer problems.)

Ok, I did this on a non-production machine that has only been up for a
few hours, and here's what happened:

======== Before =========

$ free -m
            total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           878        824         54          0        111        422
-/+ buffers/cache:        290        587
Swap:           63          0         63


======== After ========

root@b0$ free -m
            total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           878         47        830          0          6          4
-/+ buffers/cache:         36        841
Swap:           63          0         63

======================

So, I guess it worked? (I don't know what was supposed to happen, but
memory usage dropped significantly when I did this.)

However, I'm not sure this staging machine has been up long enough or
doing enough to exhibit the problem. I can try this on my production
servers (the ones I provided graphs for) late tonight, but how safe is
running this command? Does it permanently disable file caching? Do I
need to reset it afterwards? If I stop all services (databases,
logging, etc) first, am I protected against data loss?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Fred Tyler, (Sun Aug 26, 10:39 am)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Jesper Juhl, (Sun Aug 26, 6:16 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Fred Tyler, (Sun Aug 26, 11:51 am)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Aug 26, 11:52 am)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Fred Tyler, (Sun Aug 26, 12:16 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Denys Vlasenko, (Sun Aug 26, 1:03 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Fred Tyler, (Sun Aug 26, 1:41 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Aug 26, 1:44 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Aug 26, 12:30 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Fred Tyler, (Sun Aug 26, 12:58 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Aug 26, 1:42 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Fred Tyler, (Sun Aug 26, 12:49 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Aug 26, 12:58 pm)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Fred Tyler, (Sun Aug 26, 11:40 am)
Re: Slow, persistent memory leak in 2.6.20, Alexey Dobriyan, (Sun Aug 26, 11:32 am)