On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:01:13PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:Unless I'm misunderstanding it this is not the last time ever this election will be held. And it's best to define election rules in a relaxed situation like now - it saves you much hassle when there are already fixed rules if there will ever be for any reason a fierce battle between candidates. "fixed rules" doesn't has to be complicated, e.g. something like: - elected by KS attendees - every attendee has as many votes as open positions available - no cumulative voting - the candidates with most votes are elected - if there's a draw flip a coin - if requested by at least one attendee, vote will be secret would work fine and wouldn't result in overhead for uncontroversial elections. E.g. the latest SPI Board of Directors elections were followed by a discussion how different vote counting methods would have changed the result - but it was only a theoretical discussion since the election rules are fixed. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] net: Fix the prototype of call_netdevice_notifiers |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
