Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linas Vepstas
Date: Friday, August 24, 2007 - 2:35 pm

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:11:56PM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:

hrtimer worked fine on the powerpc cell arch last summer.
I assume they work on p5 and p6 too, no ??


Heh. Do the math. Even on 1gigabit cards, that's not enough:

(1gigabit/sec) x (byte/8 bits) x (packet/1500bytes) x (sec/1000 jiffy) 

is 83 packets a jiffy (for big packets, even more for small packets, 
and more again for 10 gigabit cards). So polling once per jiffy is a 
latency disaster.

--linas  

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Bodo Eggert, (Fri Aug 24, 12:04 pm)
Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Linas Vepstas, (Fri Aug 24, 1:42 pm)
Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Fri Aug 24, 2:11 pm)
Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Linas Vepstas, (Fri Aug 24, 2:35 pm)