--
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, john stultz wrote:

quoted text
> >
> > -	/* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> > -	cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> > +	} while (cycle_raw != clock->cycle_raw ||
> > +		 cycle_last != clock->cycle_last);
>
> So if I'm understanding this right, not taking a lock isn't an
> optimization (as the seq read lock code is almost the same), but a
> requirement (as this might be called while xtime_lock is held),
> correct?

Exactly. The latency tracer uses this so no locks can be grabbed
(seq_locks included).

quoted text
>
> Might want to clarify that a bit in the comment.
>

OK, will do and send a updated patch.

I wasn't in the best state writing this patch in the wee hours of the
night ;-)

-- Steve

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/