> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > > Odd. This doesn't include the entire patch; the second hunk is
> > > missing. It should go on to say:
> > >
> > > @@ -1109,10 +1113,12 @@ static void acm_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > if (acm->country_codes){
> > > - device_remove_file(&intf->dev, &dev_attr_wCountryCodes);
> > > - device_remove_file(&intf->dev, &dev_attr_iCountryCodeRelDate);
> > > + device_remove_file(&acm->control->dev,
> > > + &dev_attr_wCountryCodes);
> > > + device_remove_file(&acm->control->dev,
> > > + &dev_attr_iCountryCodeRelDate);
> > > }
> > > - device_remove_file(&intf->dev, &dev_attr_bmCapabilities);
> > > + device_remove_file(&acm->control->dev, &dev_attr_bmCapabilities);
> >
> >
> > I thought so too, untill you look at the 2.6.22.5 release, which already
> > has that change in it for some reason.
> >
> > So that part of the patch drops out, it turns out you just reverted
> > things back to the way things used to be here :)
>
> I don't understand. The history for stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git at
>
http://git.kernel.org shows that the commit for my patch, labelled
>
> 6b30a4e1c357410a78d7bcb831743b0e99bab4ad,
>
> includes both hunks. And patch-2.6.22.5.bz2 includes both as well.
> Something's fishy.
