On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Greg KH wrote:

quoted text
> > Odd.  This doesn't include the entire patch; the second hunk is
> > missing.  It should go on to say:
> > 
> > @@ -1109,10 +1113,12 @@ static void acm_disconnect(struct usb_interface *intf)
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  	if (acm->country_codes){
> > -		device_remove_file(&intf->dev, &dev_attr_wCountryCodes);
> > -		device_remove_file(&intf->dev, &dev_attr_iCountryCodeRelDate);
> > +		device_remove_file(&acm->control->dev,
> > +				&dev_attr_wCountryCodes);
> > +		device_remove_file(&acm->control->dev,
> > +				&dev_attr_iCountryCodeRelDate);
> >  	}
> > -	device_remove_file(&intf->dev, &dev_attr_bmCapabilities);
> > +	device_remove_file(&acm->control->dev, &dev_attr_bmCapabilities);
> 
> 
> I thought so too, untill you look at the 2.6.22.5 release, which already
> has that change in it for some reason.
> 
> So that part of the patch drops out, it turns out you just reverted
> things back to the way things used to be here :)

I don't understand.  The history for stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git at
http://git.kernel.org shows that the commit for my patch, labelled

	6b30a4e1c357410a78d7bcb831743b0e99bab4ad,

includes both hunks.  And patch-2.6.22.5.bz2 includes both as well.  
Something's fishy.

Alan Stern

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/