Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Linas Vepstas <linas@...>

Cc: <akepner@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...>, <Marcus@...>, Eder <meder@...>, netdev <netdev@...>, <netdev-owner@...>, Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...>, Christoph Raisch <raisch@...>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...>, Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...>, Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...>, Thomas Klein <tklein@...>

Subject: Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface

Date: Friday, August 24, 2007 - 1:45 pm

> Just to be clear, in the previous email I posted on this thread, I
quoted text> described a worst-case network ping-pong test case (send a packet, wait
> for reply), and found out that a deffered interrupt scheme just damaged
> the performance of the test case. 

When splitting rx and tx handler, I found some performance gain by 
deffering interrupt scheme in tx not rx in IPoIB driver.

Shirley
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Fri Aug 24, 9:59 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Fri Aug 24, 5:37 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Fri Aug 24, 5:32 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Linas Vepstas, (Fri Aug 24, 12:45 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Fri Aug 24, 5:43 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, , (Fri Aug 24, 11:37 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Fri Aug 24, 11:47 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Stephen Hemminger, (Fri Aug 24, 11:52 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Fri Aug 24, 1:16 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Fri Aug 24, 5:47 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Sun Aug 26, 3:36 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Sun Aug 26, 9:58 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Mon Aug 27, 11:51 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Mon Aug 27, 5:02 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Tue Aug 28, 7:21 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Tue Aug 28, 4:27 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Tue Aug 28, 4:25 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Mon Aug 27, 5:41 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Mon Aug 27, 5:56 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Tue Aug 28, 5:22 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Tue Aug 28, 7:48 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Tue Aug 28, 10:55 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue Aug 28, 8:16 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Mon Aug 27, 12:02 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Mon Aug 27, 1:05 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Mon Aug 27, 5:47 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Mon Aug 27, 4:37 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Tue Aug 28, 7:19 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Tue Aug 28, 4:21 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Wed Aug 29, 3:10 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Wed Aug 29, 4:29 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Wed Aug 29, 4:31 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, James Chapman, (Wed Aug 29, 4:15 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Wed Aug 29, 4:43 am)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, , (Fri Aug 24, 6:06 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Jan-Bernd Themann, (Fri Aug 24, 2:11 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Linas Vepstas, (Fri Aug 24, 12:51 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Shirley Ma, (Fri Aug 24, 1:45 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Rick Jones, (Fri Aug 24, 1:07 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Stevens, (Fri Aug 24, 12:50 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, David Miller, (Fri Aug 24, 5:44 pm)

Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface, Linas Vepstas, (Fri Aug 24, 5:51 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
debian developer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Linus Torvalds	Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
Tony Lindgren	[PATCH 37/90] ARM: OMAP: MPUIO wake updates
git:

linux-netdev:
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options
Alexey Dobriyan	Re: [GIT]: Networking
Dushan Tcholich	Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-mm1
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Online users

Syndicate