Re: [PATCH take #2] MAINTAINTERS: use our mail list as Blackfin arch maintainters.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan Cox <alan@...>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...>, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...>, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...>, Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...>, <joe@...>, <yi.li@...>, <vivi.li@...>, <torvalds@...>, <sonic.zhang@...>, <roy.huang@...>, <robin.getz@...>, <michael.hennerich@...>, <michael.frysinger@...>, <marc.hoffman@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <jie.zhang@...>, <grace.pan@...>, <bernd.schmidt@...>, <akpm@...>
Date: Friday, August 24, 2007 - 1:42 pm

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 10:09:43AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

It's another waste of space in my inbox due to poorly-implemented
software.

If their mailman installation uses a whitelist, so I get *one* message
per list rather than a bounce for every message I send, then that's
somewhat acceptable.  If I get mailbombed just for participating in a
thread on lkml, that's definitely not acceptable (and I will remove such
lists from the Cc).

It would be vastly better if mailman were smart enough to autoapprove
threaded replies -- it's not as if the spammers are any more likely to
forge In-Reply-To: than From: (which they already do).  Or even to not
waste my time by sending a "held for moderation" message until it's
processed by the listowner.


Not sure what ad hominem attacks have to do with this situation.  It's
not as if I can reasonably /dev/null all mailman gunk; if there's a real
exception condition, I want to see it.

-andy
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINTERS: use our mail list as Blackfin arch..., Michal Piotrowski, (Wed Aug 22, 6:23 am)
Re: [PATCH take #2] MAINTAINTERS: use our mail list as Black..., Andy Isaacson, (Fri Aug 24, 1:42 pm)