On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
> > 
> > As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership?  It's not like
> > it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in SPI.  And
> > somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you.
> 
> Ahh, I didn't realize you were suggesting making -them- do the work
> instead of just stealing their model. I suppose that could work,
> provided no one finds being an SPI member objectionable and they'd
> provide us with their member list.

I currently object to becoming an SPI member due to a number of personal
reasons at this point in time.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/